Wednesday, April 2. 2008Thoughts on the Eddington ReportHave your say. Come along and contribute to a community response to Eddington. Public meeting on the East West tunnel. Sunday 13th April, 2pm, Brunswick Town Hall. The Eddington Report on East West transport links will be released today. The details have been splashed around the media over the last few days. As expected there will be a recommendation for an East West tunnel to join the Eastern freeway to Citylink and then over to the western suburbs joining up at Ballarat or Melbourne's choice: sustainable tarnsport or more freeways. The surprise is that Eddington has recommended that no such exits be built. He has accepted the argument that any exit ramps aimed towards the CBD would increase downstream congestion. This makes the project much more marginal for private investors. The economic model of the financial backers of the project was that money was to be made funnelling and tolling traffic into the CBD. It therefore makes it unlikely that the tunnel can be funded as a private sector toll road. Therefore without significant State or Federal funding the tunnel will never be built. I also expect the poor cost benefit of the project will see the tunnel project fall over. There just is not much traffic that flows from western Melbourne to the Eastern freeway or vice a versa. Eddington also proposes a very large rail project. This involves an underground metro link between Caulfield station, through to North Melbourne and then Footscray stations. In the long term this project is probably necessary to increase the capacity of the loop. However the debate will be whether there are more worthwhile rail projects in the short to medium term. Certainly outer areas of Melbourne will want to see extensions to rail provision ahead of increased capacity. The cost of Eddington’s recommendation will be around $20 billion. More importantly there is a desire by the Brumby Government for an extended debate. As a supporter of sustainable transport it is important that the debate is broad and looks not at just the issue of more roads and rail but the conditions that will allow for mobility with a reduction of car dependency. We need to look at world best practice and we need to at the transport divide in Melbourne. A divide between the public transport, walking and cycling friendly inner areas and the car dependent outer suburbs. Have your say. Come along and contribute to a community response to Eddington. Public meeting on the East West tunnel. Sunday 13th April, 2pm, Brunswick Town Hall. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
As a resident of Brunswick I am pleased that Mr Carli is critical of the proposed tunnel. It is to be hoped that public debate will reveal an east-west road tunnel for the folly which it is. It is simple. Building more roads does not ease traffic congestion - it only creates it.
The idea for a tunnel is flawed for four reasons: 1. It is unnecessary - there is no demand but if built, will create demand; 2. It is extremely expensive; 3. The money is better spent elsewhere; 4. It is environmentally irresponsible; Simply, it is a flawed and short sighted policy. The government should concentrate on improved rail infrastructure - a link to Doncaster, for instance is sorely needed. A great deal could be built with the $10 billion estimated for the east west tunnel. We can only hope that reason prevails in this debate. The stance of Mr Carli on the issue is a good start. The road tunnel is a joke. Hardly anyone travels that way across town. CBD exist congestion is the real problem with the Eastern. A rail line to Doncaster would alleviate traffic congestion coming into the city from the eastern suburbs. It makes so much sense that it has been on the drawing board for decades. What doesn't make sense is that the government has procrastinated so long that it wants to build yet another expensive road before it will happen if ever.
Add Comment
|